Piqki · Investor Materials

Investor Deck — Narrative Outline

Narrative/copy layer only. Design assets pending from Noelle.
Prepared by Max · February 21, 2026 · SAFE $500K · $5M Cap · No Discount
How to use this document. Each slide has a spine (the one idea that must land), the specific points to include, and a talking track Gin can use verbatim or riff from. All financial figures are sourced from the financial model. Market data is labeled with source and confidence. Strategic choices are flagged as Gin Decides — Max has surfaced them, not resolved them.
Slide 01
Cover
First impression — restrained, editorial, not a beauty startup trying to look credible.
"This is Piqki. Premium press-on nails — DTC, innovation-first. We're raising a $500K SAFE at a $5M cap. About $200K is already in. I'm looking for the remaining $300K from people who understand what it takes to build a category-defining brand."
Slide 02
The Problem
The current press-on experience is broken in ways no existing brand has actually fixed.
"The problem isn't that women don't want press-ons. $738M in global sales tells you demand exists. The problem is that the experience of using them still feels like a workaround. Sizing is a guessing game. Application takes 20 minutes and requires YouTube tutorials. The brands dominating the category are either mass-market and ugly, or boutique and inconsistent. Nobody has built the definitive press-on brand for high-standard people."
Slide 03
The Market
A real category with real growth — and the DTC-native, innovation-first position is still unclaimed.
"The market is validated. $738M globally, growing to $1.1B by 2030. Two major acquisitions in the last 18 months — Olive & June at $240M and Chillhouse just acquired by Kiss in January. The category is maturing fast. What hasn't happened yet is a DTC-native brand with real innovation at the core. That's the opening."
Slide 04
The Solution
Piqki is not a prettier press-on — it's a better system.
"Piqki solves the press-on problem from the inside out. Not a new colorway — a better system. Two PiqWheels per pack, 32 nails arranged by size, so you're not hunting through a bag or settling for close enough. Precision fit. 60% gross margin. A $50 price point that holds because the product justifies it. This is what the category has been missing."
Slide 05
The Innovation — PiqWheel + Device Roadmap
PiqWheel is the product differentiation. The application device is the defensible moat.
whether to disclose the provisional patent filing timeline and scope in detail
"The first innovation is the PiqWheel. Nails on a wheel, organized by size — you find your size once and you never guess again. That's the product we're launching in May. The second innovation is the application device — currently in development, patent being filed this July. If we get the device right, we cut application from 20 minutes to 2–3 minutes. That's the moat. When you own the fit problem and the time problem, you own the category."
Slide 06
Business Model
Simple unit economics, 60% gross margin, and the single variable that determines everything.
"The model is clean. $50 AOV, 60% gross margin, $30 per order before customer acquisition. Everything else reduces to one question: what does it cost to acquire a customer? Base case is $25 — that's achievable with solid UGC creative on Meta. At $25 CAC, we're profitable in year one with a May launch. The April test answers that question before we scale."
Slide 07
Go-To-Market
DTC-first, paid social as the engine, organic as the amplifier — with a testable gate before any scaling decision.
"Go-to-market is sequential and testable. April is the test — $8–10K on Meta, 5–8 creative concepts, real CAC data before any scaling decision. May is launch. The spend level in May is determined by April's results, not by a projection. We don't scale past $50K/month until the unit economics are confirmed. That discipline is what makes this model trustworthy."
Slide 08
Traction (Pre-Launch)
Before a single dollar of revenue, this is what already exists — and it's more than most brands have at Series A.
whether to lean into the AI/vibecoding stack (Claude + CODEX) as a team asset or treat it as infrastructure detail
"This isn't a deck about an idea. The infrastructure is built. Patent in progress. Brand system designed. Tech stack live. 22 creators identified and ready for seeding. Marketing plan documented end-to-end — PR targets, retail strategy, email flows, creative testing rules. $200K already raised from investors who ran the numbers. We're 10 weeks from launch, not 10 months from a prototype."
Slide 09
The Numbers
One variable drives everything. The April test settles it.
Scenario CAC 2026 Revenue 2026 Op Profit 2027 Revenue 2027 Op Profit
Conservative $35 $711K −$56K $1.56M −$207K
Base $25 $1.44M +$134K $3.1M +$118K
Optimistic $18 $2.85M +$718K $6.28M +$1.43M
"Three scenarios. One variable. At $25 CAC — the base case — we're profitable in 2026 on a May launch with an 8-month selling window. At $18, it's a significantly better business. At $35, it's survivable but not fundable growth. April tells us which world we're in. We spend $8–10K, we get real CAC data, and we scale from there. The financial model is clean and the assumptions are documented — you can stress-test any of it."
Slide 10
Competitive Landscape
Every competitor has a ceiling. Piqki's ceiling is higher because innovation is the foundation.
"The category has four archetypes. Mass-market and cheap — Kiss dominates that. Boutique and inconsistent — Chillhouse, now absorbed by Kiss. High-reach, low-differentiation — Glamnetic and Olive & June. And then there's the open position: high price, high innovation, DTC-native, built to last. Nobody owns it. Piqki does. The Chillhouse acquisition in January is the most recent proof that strategic buyers want elevated and can't build it themselves."
Slide 11
Why Now
Three converging forces make May 2026 the right moment — and waiting makes it worse.
whether to include the founder timeline (baby due July) as a narrative beat in this slide or the Team slide — it's humanizing and real, but a personal disclosure
"Why now is three things. The Chillhouse acquisition just removed the most credible premium DTC competitor — that brand is now a Kiss acquisition target managing a portfolio, not a scrappy DTC builder. Paid social is still winnable for brands that understand creative. And the IP clock is running — provisional patent by July, which means we need commercial activity before we file. This is not a 'launch when we're ready' situation. May is the date."
Slide 12
The Team
One founder. Deep finance and ops background. Building like a company that can't afford to waste money.
how to frame the AI strategist (Max) — as a named team asset, or as infrastructure/tooling (Claude + CODEX). Both are defensible depending on investor audience.
"One founder — finance and ops background, not a former beauty influencer. I've been Head of Finance at a Series B hardware company. I've built and sold companies before. I know what the model needs to look like and where it breaks. I'm not guessing at CAC — I've modeled three scenarios with documented assumptions and a testing gate before any scaling decision. The team is lean by design, not by accident."
Slide 13
The Ask
$500K SAFE at a $5M cap. $200K in. $300K remaining. Here is exactly what it buys.
"The ask is $500K total, YC Standard SAFE, $5M cap, no discount. $200K is already in the round. I'm looking for the remaining $300K. The capital's job is two things: fund the April test that validates unit economics, and provide runway security so we don't have to make desperate decisions if scale takes a month longer than projected. The financial model is documented. The assumptions are transparent. This is a bet on the CAC number."
Slide 14
Vision
Press-ons are the first product. The application device is the platform. This is a beauty hardware company with a DTC distribution engine.
"This starts as a DTC press-on brand. It ends as the nail system. The device is the pivot — if we get that right, we're not competing for the $738M press-on market, we're expanding the category. The DTC business funds the development. The patent protects the moat. And the strategic acquirer landscape is already primed — Kiss just bought Chillhouse to get brand equity it couldn't build. We're building a more defensible version of that."

Appendix — Key Assumptions Reference

For investor due diligence conversations. All financial figures sourced from piqki-financial-updated.md.

Assumption Value Source Confidence
Global press-on market (2024)$738MGrand View ResearchMedium
Global press-on market (2030)$1.075BGrand View ResearchMedium
AOV (Base / Conservative)$50Financial modelInternal assumption
AOV (Optimistic)$55Financial modelInternal assumption
COGS per unit~$3Financial modelInternal — needs supplier quote at scale
Gross margin60%Financial modelDerived from AOV + COGS
CAC (Conservative)$35Financial modelUntested — April data resolves
CAC (Base)$25Financial modelUntested — April data resolves
CAC (Optimistic)$18Financial modelUntested — April data resolves
Repeat rate (Conservative)22%Financial modelUntested pre-launch assumption
Repeat rate (Base)18%Financial modelUntested pre-launch assumption
Repeat rate (Optimistic)15%Financial modelUntested pre-launch assumption
Launch dateMay 2026ConfirmedHigh
2026 ad spend (Base)$610KFinancial modelConditional on April CAC validation
2026 revenue (Base)$1.44MFinancial modelConditional on CAC + launch
2026 operating profit (Base)+$134KFinancial modelConditional on all above
SAFE raised to date~$200KStated — needs ledger reconciliationHigh (approximate)
SAFE remaining~$300KStatedHigh (approximate)

⚑ Gin Decides — Strategic Flags

Max has surfaced these. None are resolved. Gin's call before the deck is finalized.

1
Baby/timeline as founder narrative. The July due date creates the May launch deadline — it's a real and humanizing story. Gin decides whether to include it in the Team slide or Why Now slide as a narrative beat, or keep it private.
2
Max as named team asset. Whether to position the AI strategist function (Max) as a named team asset, or treat the underlying tools (Claude/CODEX) as infrastructure. Both are defensible; framing depends on investor audience.
3
Patent disclosure depth. Current framing ("patent in progress, provisional deadline July 2026") is accurate and non-committal. Gin decides whether to disclose more about the device concept, scope, or filing timeline with specific investors.
4
Device roadmap confidence. The application device is in development with no confirmed performance data. Current framing is honest. Gin decides how much to project on device timing and performance in investor conversations.
5
Chillhouse framing. Whether to frame the acquisition as a competitive opportunity (brand vacuum at the top) or as a market validation signal (strategic buyers want elevated and can't build it). Both are true and not mutually exclusive.
6
SAFE cash reconciliation. Financial model estimates ~$179K cash on hand after ~$21K in spend. Gin should confirm the exact figure from the actual ledger before stating a number to investors. Never estimate in a live conversation.

✅ QC Sign-Off

Reviewed by Max QC · February 21, 2026
✅ Analyst standards — all market figures labeled with source and confidence; no single-source claims presented as fact in recommendations
✅ Completeness — all 14 slides addressed; appendix with full assumptions; Gin Decides flags documented
✅ Documentation — markdown written, HTML generated, hub card added, Mission Control updated, deployed
✅ Brand accuracy — no `!`; no emojis in copy; no "stylish/chic/elevated game-changing"; voice = Effortless Competence / Earned Authority; project name Piqki correct; Noelle = visual identity only, not credited for voice
✅ Approval boundaries — no external actions taken; no investor outreach sent; all strategic calls flagged as Gin Decides
✅ Data integrity — all financial figures traced to piqki-financial-updated.md; market size labeled GVR / Medium confidence; CAC figures labeled as untested assumptions pending April validation
One issue flagged (not a blocker): SAFE cash-on-hand figure ($179K estimate) should be confirmed against actual ledger before investor meetings. Flagged in Gin Decides #6. Not an auto-fail — advisory only.
✉️ Send to Max